I believe with extra time, you may have. Unfortunately extra time is not always permissible and we may only work within our means. How would you rate today's performance yourself?
Ah. How nostalgic. I do not tend to be satisfied with less than I know myself to be capable of. We were a little too focused on Hua Cheng, but the harm there was slight. But I do still have the nagging sense some evidence on his person was missed, despite our efforts to be thorough.
I believe you and I have that in common, Miss Nonagesimus. It's difficult to split your attention when there are several things that could lead to a solution, but breaking each section down may help. You find him suspicious?
His hostage? Or someone else? Evidence can be quite damning if you don't link it to the correct source. ...that's what happened with Miss Lionett at the station, was it not?
Several pieces of evidence were pointed directly at her, and yet she was innocent. It isn't enough to find evidence. It's the application that's key. Even if Hua Cheng matched pieces of evidence, there was always going to be one crucial difference. However, I am sure you're already aware of this.
I am, but I do appreciate going over it again with someone whose opinions I am willing to take into account. Which is not something I would say for many, but perhaps you are an exception. I will say nothing further on this out of caution that certain remarks would be inadvisable.
The crucial difference being the absence of physical evidence, rather than conjecture?
Perhaps so. But that's correct. You may not always have actual evidence available to you, such as what Miss Flayn had bitten into, but you are able to fulfill the thought of the course of action and begin to narrow down and eliminate other suspects. Closing loops, if you will.
See to it that you do. ...was there anything else you wished to debrief on today? I imagine small talk isn't entirely in your wheelhouse, but should you like we may continue.
Some of them are far more tolerable than others. Some are people I wouldn't have picked to work with myself. And some of them may actually be more efficient than you'd believe.
I believe that may be quite subjective. Some of you may feel more perturbed by some than others. But overall, I would say likely no. All of us are focused on our job in some form or another.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
[it didn't really come up at trial since sieg was already just full on stabbing.]
no subject
Unfortunately extra time is not always permissible and we may only work within our means.
How would you rate today's performance yourself?
no subject
I do not tend to be satisfied with less than I know myself to be capable of.
We were a little too focused on Hua Cheng, but the harm there was slight.
But I do still have the nagging sense some evidence on his person was missed, despite our efforts to be thorough.
no subject
It's difficult to split your attention when there are several things that could lead to a solution, but breaking each section down may help.
You find him suspicious?
no subject
no subject
Evidence can be quite damning if you don't link it to the correct source.
...that's what happened with Miss Lionett at the station, was it not?
no subject
Do you have a reason bringing it up?
no subject
It isn't enough to find evidence. It's the application that's key.
Even if Hua Cheng matched pieces of evidence, there was always going to be one crucial difference.
However, I am sure you're already aware of this.
no subject
Which is not something I would say for many, but perhaps you are an exception.
I will say nothing further on this out of caution that certain remarks would be inadvisable.
The crucial difference being the absence of physical evidence, rather than conjecture?
no subject
But that's correct. You may not always have actual evidence available to you, such as what Miss Flayn had bitten into, but you are able to fulfill the thought of the course of action and begin to narrow down and eliminate other suspects.
Closing loops, if you will.
no subject
no subject
...was there anything else you wished to debrief on today?
I imagine small talk isn't entirely in your wheelhouse, but should you like we may continue.
no subject
Yes, alright.
Though I cannot really ask you any questions about yourself.
no subject
What questions could you possibly have already?
no subject
Perhaps instead...what do you think of the other staff?
no subject
Some are people I wouldn't have picked to work with myself.
And some of them may actually be more efficient than you'd believe.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
What I'm really asking is whether there are any one ought to be wary of.
no subject
Some of you may feel more perturbed by some than others.
But overall, I would say likely no.
All of us are focused on our job in some form or another.
no subject
no subject
But it is all I can offer.