Every criminal does not wish to be caught. So you must look at every case from their perspective, thinking of even the most irrational conclusions. [a pause.] So long as you don't grow stuck on one theory for too long once proven implausible.
The latter, primarily. Though the former as well. We never really developed a theory of what exactly happened to Alphinaud, so it is hard to see through the killer's perspective.
...I do wish we were at liberty to discuss previous cases. [they sound disappointed, actually.] Though I imagine not having his body right away also made things a little more difficult.
It seems to me that some portions of these cases are more relevant than others. Finer details to build the full picture, but not always so necessary to need to understand for the answer. Perhaps those were in that same vein, perhaps they were not.
So maybe the soda was not relevant, but I do think we were meant to glean something from the peculiar pattern of injuries he had - the bruises and the burn. I'm simply not sure what.
It's difficult to decipher in the aftermath of it all...but it gives you insight of how to approach the next week. That, I think, is still valuable knowledge.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
[you know. like vore.]
no subject
I don't disagree with you, but I think we struggled this time to put events together.
no subject
In terms of a timeline? Or how the evidence you found strung together?
no subject
no subject
How far did you get in theorizing anyhow?
no subject
no subject
no subject
So maybe the soda was not relevant, but I do think we were meant to glean something from the peculiar pattern of injuries he had - the bruises and the burn. I'm simply not sure what.
no subject
no subject
I will keep it in mind, then.
[ends the thread to start a new one!!]